N. Yu. Avina
PECULIARITIES OF INFLECTION OF FOREIGN-LANGUAGE VOCABULARY (AS EXEMPLIFIED IN THE LITHUANIAN-RUSSIAN LANGUAGE CONTACTING) |
11 - 21 |
L. V. Balashova
CONCEPTUAL METAPHORICAL MODEL: WORD-FORMATIVE AND GRAMMATICAL ASPECTS |
21 - 31 |
E. I. Golanova
POLYSEMY OF SUFFIXAL UNIVERBS AND ITS REPRESENTTIONS IN THE EDRES |
31 - 36 |
V. V. Dementyev
CHAINS OF SPEECH GENRE SYSTEMATIZATION: LEXICALIZATION AND GRAMMATICALIZATION OF THE LINKS |
36 - 48 |
O. P. Ermakova
PARADIGMATICALLY LIMITED METONYMIC MEANINGS |
48 - 57 |
A. V. Zanadvorova
PROBLEMS OF LEXICOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION OF VERBS WITH THE PREFIXES POD- AND PRI- IN THE EXPLANATORY DICTIONARY OF RUSSIAN EVERYDAY SPEECH |
57 - 67 |
O. S. Issers
LEXICO-GRAMMATICAL ADAPTATION OF ENGLISH LOANWORDS OF FASHION IN MODERN RUSSIAN (AS ILLUSTRATED BY THE LOANPHRASE MUST HAVE) |
67 - 76 |
E. V. Kakorina
PROBLEMS OF FIXING AND LEXICOGRAPHICAL DESCRIPTION OF COMMUNICATIVES (REVEALED IN THE COURSE OF WORK ON THE EXPLANATORY DICTIONARY OF THE RUSSIAN EVERYDAY SPEECH (EDRES)) |
76 - 101 |
M. A. Kormilitsyna
LEXICAL UNITS WITH THE PROPOSITIONAL MEANING AS A TOOL OF SEMANTIC EXTENSION OF THE SIMPLE SENTENCE |
101 - 108 |
L. Р. Krysin
COMMUNICATIVELY RELEVANT MEANINGS AND THEIR LEXICAL AND GRAMMATICAL EXPRESSION IN EVERYDAY SPEECH |
108 - 116 |
Galina I. Kustova
VERBS WITH THE SEMANTICS OF SUCCESS / FAILURE AND STRATEGIES FOR CONCEPTUALIZING AGENTIVE SITUATIONS |
116 - 128 |
Anna L. Leonteva, Kristina V. Litvintseva
SO, IN RUSSIAN, THEY SAY SO: THE INTRODUCTORY PHRASE STALO BYT’ (MEANING ‘SO’) IN RUSSIAN |
128 - 139 |
Е. V. Marinova
THE IMPACT OF THE POLYSEMY OF LOAN WORDS ON THEIR GRAMMATICAL CHARACTERISTICS (A CASE STUDY OF THE CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN LANGUAGE) |
139 - 147 |
N. B. Mechkovskaya
THE NOMINATIVE AND THE COMMUNICATIVE LEVELS OF THE LANGUAGE STRUCTURE: TO WHAT EXTENT THE REPRODUCIBILITY AND IDIOMATICITY OF UNITS ARE INHERENT TO THEM? |
147 - 159 |
S. E. Nikitina
THE CONFESSIONAL WORLD AND LANGUAGE STEREOTYPES |
159 - 171 |
N. A. Nikolina
THE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF HYPHENATED COMPLEXES IN MODERN WRITTEN LANGUAGE |
171 - 179 |
B. Yu. Norman
TOWARDS THE EXPRESSION OF THE FUNCTION MAGN IN RUSSIAN EVERYDAY LANGUAGE (THE UTTERANCES OF THE Tot esche student! (‘HE IS THAT STUDENT!’) TYPE) |
179 - 189 |
Nadezhda K. Onipenko
ABOUT THE GROUNDS FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF SYNTACTIC UNITS |
189 - 201 |
E. V. Paducheva
HOW MANY MEANINGS DOES THE RUSSIAN VSE-TAKI (‘STILL, NEVERTHELESS’) HAVE? |
201 - 209 |
A. R. Pestova
NOUN GOVERNMENT IN RUSSIAN EVERYDAY SPEECH AND ITS REPRESENTATION IN THE DICTIONARY |
209 - 218 |
T. B. Radbil
ACTIVE LEXICAL-GRAMMATICAL PROCESSES IN RUSSIAN AT THE BEGINNING OF THE XXIST CENTURY: A PROBLEM OF LINGUO-CULTOROLOGICAL INTERPRETATION |
218 - 227 |
Renate Rathmayr
METACOMMUNICATIVE ELEMENTS IN BUSINESS COMMUNICATION: WITH EXAMPLES FROM BUSINESS MEETINGS AND JOB INTERVIEWS |
227 - 241 |
E. V. Rakhilina, Daria (Aleksandrovna) Ryzhova
MICROHISTORY OF SEMANTIC SHIFTS: THE CASE OF THE RUSSIAN ADJECTIVE SLAVNYJ |
241 - 255 |
R. I. Rozina
THE STRATEGY OF PREDICATES CONCEPTUALIZATION: VERBS OF SPOILING (DIRTYING) — MEANING, COMBINABILITY, ASPECTUAL BEHAVIOR |
256 - 268 |
V. A. Salimovsky
THE INTERRELATION OF LEXICAL AND GRAMMATICAL UNITS IN STYLISTIC-SPEECH SYSTEM |
268 - 276 |
L. L. Fedorova
THE RUSSIAN WORD COMPOSITION: BETWEEN LEXIS AND GRAMMAR |
276 - 285 |
O. E. Frolova
CHARACTERIZING MEANINGS OF SOCIAL STRATIFICATION TERMS (SEMANTIC AND GRAMMATICAL INDICATORS) |
285 - 295 |
A. E. Tsumarev, L. L. Shestakova
PECULIARITIES OF THE PRESENTATION OF GRAMMATICAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE WORD IN THE NEW “ACADEMIC EXPLANATORY DICTIONARY OF THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE” |
295 - 303 |
V. N. Shaposhnikov
SEMANTIC CLASSES OF VERBS: LEXICAL-GRAMMATICAL PROCESSES IN THE MODERN RUSSIAN LANGUAGE |
303 - 309 |
Igor A. Sharonov
INTRODUCTORY PHRASES AS MARKERS AND MODIFIERS OF SPEECH ACTS: EVERYDAY CONFESSIONS |
309 - 323 |
O. A. Sharykina
SOME ASPECTS OF THE DESCRIPTION OF IDIOMES IN “EXPLANATORY DICTIONARY OF THE RUSSIAN EVERYDAY SPEECH” |
323 - 329 |
T. V. Shmeleva
THE EXPRESSION OF MODALITY: THE PROBLEM OF THE COMPREHENSIVE DESCRIPTION |
329 - 336 |
